The public is welcome to see the dogs and cats in need of loving homes. Chestnut St., Dunkirk, will hold open adoption hours from 6 to 8 p.m. Lakeshore Humane Society Wednesday open adoption hours Fee for those who own or rent an instrument $105. Ensembles/lessons 3 to 3:45 p.m., band practice 4 to 4:50 p.m. SUNY Fredonia, Mason Hall, new members come to the lobby at 2:50 p.m. ![]() For details, contact Kathy at 716 792-4226. All are welcome to visit with new friends and get help losing weight. Weigh-ins at 2 p.m., meeting at 2:30 p.m. Call 716 753-4582 for details about options for a spectrum of immunizations including those for influenza, COVID-19, pneumonia and more. North Haven Apartments and Sherman Central School, 125 CHurch St., Sherman, 2 to 4 p.m. GHS District auditorium, Prospect Street, 1 p.m.Ĭhautauqua County Office for Aging Services vaccination event Gowanda High School Thespian Society presents: “Cinderella” free preview for seniors Participate in stories, songs and fingerplays, Take away craft or activity for extended learning. lawmakers also recommended that the U.K government consider introducing a process for reviewing sanctions on individuals if they meet certain conditions, such as providing support for reconstruction of Ukraine.Sinclairville Free Library presents: Child’s Playġ5 Main St., 1 p.m. The Chelsea funds are an important “case study of the challenge that we face in trying to use frozen assets for the benefit of Ukraine,” Keatinge said.Īn agreement between Abramovich and the British government could set “a precedent for others to be able to donate, in a voluntary way for humanitarian good in Ukraine,” Ricketts said. Thus far, Western nations have struggled to use billions of dollars of sanctioned Russian sovereign or private assets to help Ukraine. that the funds could only be used for projects inside Ukraine. Penrose said he hoped an agreement could be reached soon and suggested the funds are now stuck in a “bureaucratic hole,” because the U.K. Penrose disagreed, saying he has not seen any indication that Abramovich was trying to steer the funds in a way that seeks “to curry favor with the Kremlin.” Keatinge suggested that Abramovich might shy away from any arrangement in which all of the Chelsea funds are spent in territory controlled by the Ukrainian government - as opposed to humanitarian projects elsewhere - because that might put him in “conflict” with the Kremlin. “Of the high-profile oligarchs, Abramovich is the one who, over the last two years, has managed to successfully keep a foot in both camps,” said Tom Keatinge, director of the Centre for Financial Crime and Security Studies at the Royal United Services Institute in London. ![]() He has positioned himself as a middleman between Russia and the West, facilitating prisoner swaps and - the Kremlin said in March 2022 - served as a mediator approved by Russia and Ukraine in negotiations. When the EU sanctioned Abramovich, it accused him of having “privileged access” to Russian President Vladimir Putin and of “maintaining very good relations with him.”Ībramovich has tried to carry out a balancing act since the war began, analysts say. In December, Abramovich lost a challenge against the European Union’s decision to issue a travel ban and freeze his assets in the bloc. ![]() That could include refugees in Europe as well as those suffering from food shortages in Africa following disruption to food supply routes, he said. The terms of the agreement between the British government and Abramovich are not public but the deal foresaw the money being used to help those suffering from “the consequences of the Ukraine war,” Penrose said. He said the British government would veto any such move.Ī former chief executive of Unicef UK, Mike Penrose, who was appointed to head the foundation that will control the funds when it is agreed they can be unfrozen, told The Associated Press that use of the money in Russian-occupied areas of Ukraine would not be permitted because it would contravene existing sanctions. That could include Ukrainians outside Ukraine, and lawmakers have heard evidence to suggest that Abramovich “also perhaps foresaw it being used in Russian controlled parts of Ukraine as well,” Ricketts said. To move the funds, Abramovich must apply for a license that the British government has said is contingent on the money being used for “exclusively humanitarian purposes in Ukraine.”Īt the time of the sale, Abramovich said in a statement that the money would be transferred to a foundation - yet to be created - which would be “for the benefit of all victims of the war in Ukraine.” ![]() The frozen funds still belong to Abramovich, who sold Chelsea to a consortium fronted by Los Angeles Dodgers part-owner Todd Boehly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |